Nevada, National and International News

Nuclear technology companies interested in doing business in Gillette, mayor says

One long-term repository site, or deep geological repository, in Nevada’s Yucca Mountain was under development for decades, beginning in the 1980s, before the project’s funding ceased in 2010. The Trump administration has so far declined to pick up the Yucca Mountain project.

Crossroads contention: Natrona County is ground zero for Wyoming’s nuclear dilemma

All nuclear sites across the U.S. are required to hold their spent fuel,” Radiant Senior Operations Manager Makai Cartman told the Casper Kiwanis Club on July 24. He added it’s a temporary solution to the lack of a permanent national repository for high-level nuclear waste. Yucca Mountain in Nevada, once a prime candidate for that repository, is no longer being considered, and the U.S. Department of Energy is now working through a siting process in search of host communities.

The Enduring Problem of Nuclear Reactor Waste

Clearly, though, the basic challenges inherent in the toxicity of the waste of a normal functioning reactor were never fully accounted for. Throughout the 1980s, for instance, efforts grew to create a repository in the American West where such spent fuel could be deposited and kept for the decades—even centuries—in which it was thought to remain toxic. The most protracted effort focused on Yucca Mountain in Nevada. The proposed Yucca Mountain Repository has remained mired in legal issues involving jurisdiction (it is located on the Western Shoshone Native American reservation) and the issue of a state’s right to determine its economic and environmental future. In short, no one wants nuclear waste in their backyard.

What Is A Problem Commonly Associated With Nuclear Power Facilities?

4. **Policy & Politics:** Governments spend billions researching disposal solutions (like deep geological repositories – Yucca Mountain in the US, Onkalo in Finland). Finding a site, getting approval, and building it takes decades of political wrangling and public debate. Progress is painfully slow.

UNLV researchers tackling nuclear waste crisis by transforming danger into energy

None of the radiochemists on campus would say they’re in favor of a dump site, Hatchett said — they don’t want to see Yucca Mountain actually be used as a radioactive waste repository.

How and where is nuclear waste stored in the US?

A 1987 federal law named Yucca Mountain, in Nevada, as a permanent disposal site for nuclear waste – but political and legal challenges led to construction delays. Work on the site had barely started before Congress ended the project’s funding altogether in 2011.

No need to go 'NIMBY' on nuclear power | BIDLACK

There is a term well known in the political world, and that term is “NIMBY,” standing for “not in my back yard.”

The enduring dilemma of managing American high-level nuclear waste

Legislation adopted during the 1980s was designed to resolve this issue through the construction of a geological repository for permanent disposal. It specified that site selection and facility development should be completed by 1999. But federal designation without local or state consent of a southern Nevada site, commonly known as Yucca Mountain, triggered decades of aggressive political and legal resistance at the state level. This included the creation of a Nevada agency that repeatedly challenged Yucca site suitability on environmental and technical grounds. It also emphasized that the state operated no nuclear reactors, contending that Nevada was being singled out unfairly to solve a national problem not of its making.

Western governors say they should have control over where nuclear waste is stored

Highly radioactive waste, a by-product of electricity generation, has been piling up at nuclear power plants around the country in recent years, and the federal government has been searching for a temporary location to put it. In 2010, plans for a permanent repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada fell through.

Western governors say they should have control over where nuclear waste is stored

Highly radioactive waste, a by-product of electricity generation, has been piling up at nuclear power plants around the country in recent years, and the federal government has been searching for a temporary location to put it. In 2010, plans for a permanent repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada fell through.

Where Is The Nuclear Waste From Nuclear Power Plants In The United States Currently Being Stored?

Everyone knows this “store it where it’s made” plan isn’t ideal forever. Plants weren’t designed as eternal dumps. Security costs add up. Communities near these sites worry. For years, the big hope was Yucca Mountain in Nevada. It was picked deep underground. Billions were spent studying it. Then politics hit hard. Nevada said no way. Funding dried up. Yucca Mountain stalled out, stuck in limbo.

Supreme Court clears the way for temporary nuclear waste storage in Texas and New Mexico

Plans for a permanent underground storage facility at Yucca Mountain, northwest of Las Vegas, are stalled because of staunch opposition from most Nevada residents and officials. Nuclear waste can remain radioactive for hundreds of thousands of years.

Supreme Court clears the way for temporary nuclear waste storage in Texas and New Mexico

Plans for a permanent underground storage facility at Yucca Mountain, northwest of Las Vegas, are stalled because of staunch opposition from most Nevada residents and officials. Nuclear waste can remain radioactive for hundreds of thousands of years.

With Nevada's Yucca Mountain site stalled, Supreme Court OKs nuclear waste sites in Texas

The commission approved temporary storage sites in Texas in 2021 because nuclear power plants were running out of room and the permanent underground storage facility planned for Nevada’s Yucca Mountain stalled largely due to local opposition.

Despite reassurances, Nevadans in Congress see Yucca threat resurfacing

President Donald Trump and his administration have continuously assured Nevadans that their interest in nuclear energy doesn’t mean they’ll revive the federal government’s plan to store waste at Yucca Mountain, northwest of Las Vegas.

Which Of The Following Is True Regarding Nuclear Power Plants?

**The Waste Problem Isn’t Going Away**
Storing nuclear waste safely remains a headache. Finland built a underground tomb called Onkalo. It’s designed to hold waste for 100,000 years. The U.S. still debates where to put its waste. Nevada’s Yucca Mountain site got scrapped after political fights. Until a permanent fix exists, waste stays at reactor sites. Critics argue this risks leaks or theft. Supporters say current storage is safe.

Meta strikes nuclear power deal to secure long-term energy for AI infrastructure

Concerns persist around radioactive waste, safety, and proliferation, with the US still lacking a permanent waste storage solution after Yucca Mountain was shelved.

Wyoming lawmakers mull, again, allowing nuclear fuel waste

That’s not likely to happen anytime soon, according to federal officials. It will take an act of Congress to resume efforts to establish one at Yucca Mountain, or anywhere else, according to Idaho National Laboratory’s Thomas, who worked for more than a decade on the Yucca Mountain project.

“Yucca Mountain has been defunded and is not being pursued,” Thomas said. If Congress were to direct the U.S. Department of Energy to resume the work, he added, “I would say that we are probably four or more decades off.”

Culture, security and radioactive waste: challenges abound for nuclear-powered data centres

Nuclear waste is typically buried far beneath the Earth’s surface. In the US state of New Mexico, for instance, authorities store nuclear waste from weapons research and production in natural salt deposits more than 600 metres underground. A similar waste repository was proposed at a site in Nevada, in Yucca Mountain, about 90 miles from Las Vegas, but has failed to receive regulatory approval.

“The biggest issue is who will be responsible for managing and disposing of the SMR waste,” Krall says. When the US legislature defunded the Yucca Mountain project in 2009, for instance, a stalemate ensued over who was responsible for disposing of the waste intended for the site. The US, Krall adds, currently lacks sufficient storage capacity for its nuclear waste.

Wyoming lawmakers mull, again, allowing nuclear fuel waste

That’s not likely to happen anytime soon, according to federal officials. It will take an act of Congress to resume efforts to establish one at Yucca Mountain, or anywhere else, according to Idaho National Laboratory’s Thomas, who worked for more than a decade on the Yucca Mountain project.

“Yucca Mountain has been defunded and is not being pursued,” Thomas said. If Congress were to direct the U.S. Department of Energy to resume the work, he added, “I would say that we are probably four or more decades off.”

There's 90,000 tons of nuclear waste in the US. How and where is it stored?

A 1987 federal law named Yucca Mountain, in Nevada, as a permanent disposal site for nuclear waste — but political and legal challenges led to construction delays.

Weighing Whether the United States Should Dispose of Defense HLW and SNF First: Roundtable Summary

The roundtable was organized in response to the US HLW and SNF disposal program’s ongoing lack of momentum. The one disposal site designated by law and approved by Congress—Yucca Mountain—has not received appropriations from Congress to move forward since 2010.
One participant noted that the United States has been working on a model of tightly interspersed disposal of defense and commercial waste at emplacement areas in the Yucca Mountain repository, meaning that the disposal of the two inventories had to be done simultaneously.
One speaker felt that all options need to be kept open, and that the primary issue is that the United States needs a hosting agreement—i.e., a politically and socially acceptable site, which the country does not have in Yucca Mountain.

5 takeaways from Chris Wright’s Hill visit

The U.S. does not have a permanent facility to store nuclear waste, after years of opposition from Nevada politicians to the Yucca Mountain repository. Wright said DOE will take an “opt-in approach” for the siting of such a repository, a reference to support from local communities.

US Waste Agreement Clears Way For Critical Research Into Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage

In 1987, US Congress designated Yucca Mountain in Nevada as the only site for construction of a repository for spent nuclear fuel, but in 2009, the Obama administration ended work at the site after deeming the project unworkable.

U.S. Supreme Court Deliberates on Temporary Nuclear Waste Storage Amidst National Disposal Dilemma

An effort spanning decades has aimed to consolidate this waste at a single site, designated by a 1987 law as Yucca Mountain in Nevada.

How and where is nuclear waste stored in the US?

A 1987 federal law named Yucca Mountain, in Nevada, as a permanent disposal site for nuclear waste – but political and legal challenges led to construction delays. Work on the site had barely started before Congress ended the project’s funding altogether in 2011.

Permeability scaling relationships of volcanic tuff from core to field scale measurements

Extensive permeability and tracer transport tests have been performed to analyze the flow properties of welded and partially welded tuffs and to determine their suitability to store nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain, NV23,24. Additional tuff testing related to the Yucca Mountain Project was performed at the Apache Leap Research Site, Arizona, USA (ALRS)25,26,27,28.

How and where is nuclear waste stored in the US?

For decades, the nation has been trying to send it all to one secure location.

A 1987 federal law named Yucca Mountain, in Nevada, as a permanent disposal site for nuclear waste—but political and legal challenges led to construction delays. Work on the site had barely started before Congress ended the project's funding altogether in 2011.

The U.S. Can Innovate on Nuclear Waste Storage Front

In concert with the NWPA, then-President Bush and Congress proposed the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository in Nevada as a storage facility in 2002. The Obama administration’s DOE terminated the project despite no documented safety issues. A 2014 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) safety evaluation report confirmed it was safe to store nuclear waste at this site.

Biden-era Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm opposed Yucca Mountain, and the administration instead opted to prioritize nuclear waste education over spent fuel storage. Thanks to bad policymaking, taxpayers shoulder $400 million to $800 million annually due to inaction here. Now, with a second Trump administration, this issue is likely to be addressed across the board.

Is a nuclear renaissance coming?

Nevada
• In 2002, Congress approved the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository as the long-term home of the nation’s nuclear waste, or spent fuel, but in 2011, the project was canceled following intense local opposition. However, the Trump administration hinted at restarting construction.
• Project 2025, the Trump administration’s far-right playbook, wants to resume nuclear warhead testing at the Nevada Test Site.